20111001

Declaration of Occupation

Yesterday, the "NYC General Assembly" release their "Declaration of the Occupation of New York City". I'd like to acknowledge the homage to the Declaration of Independence; if only the author(s) would have actually understood that document.

Just thought I'd address some of the finer points of it.

As one people, united, we acknowledge the reality: that the future of the human race requires the cooperation of its members; that our system must protect our rights, and upon corruption of that system, it is up to the individuals to protect their own rights, and those of their neighbors;
Very true.

that a democratic government derives its just power from the people,
All governments do. This is the nature of governments.

but corporations do not seek consent to extract wealth from the people and the Earth
Actually, yes they do, in the form of contracts. It's not like BOA is breaking into your house and stealing from your cookie jar. If you take out a loan, you have contractually agreed (consented) to the terms of that loan. These terms typically involve transfers of capital.

They have taken our houses through an illegal foreclosure process
Foreclosure is by definition a legal process. It is generally enacted for failure to pay a loan under the terms of that loan agreement.
, despite not having the original mortgage.
I'm pretty sure most of those agreements stipulate that a lender may transfer the loan to a third party.

They have taken bailouts from taxpayers with impunity,
In many cases, financial institutions were forced by the government to take these bailouts under duress. Even where that is not the case, this anger is misdirected. I'm as pissed about corporate bailouts as the next guy, but the problem is not with companies that are acting in self interest, but with a government that is not acting in the interest of the people. Not only shouldn't the federal government have the authority to provide welfare to corporations, but it in fact doesn't.

and continue to give Executives exorbitant bonuses.
As they are contractually obligated.

They have poisoned the food supply through negligence, and undermined the farming system through monopolization.
We have farm subsidies to thank for much of this. The rest, is simply a matter of market forces. Pesticides and modified crops are employed in order to ensure market demands are met. If market demands are not met, people go hungry. Sure, it would be nice to only eat locally grown organic foods, but I'm betting there would be quite a bit of starvation if that suddenly became the only option. Pesticides may give me cancer in 30 years, but I'll be dead in a week without food.

They have profited off of the torture, confinement, and cruel treatment of countless animals, and actively hide these practices.
Seeing as how animals hold little information of value, and haven't the means to communicate it, and how punishing them is rarely in the interest of a business, I'm guessing corporate animal torture is not widespread. Confinement, and cruel treatment... ok, but I'll not get in to weighing the benefits of such treatment.

Hiding these practices? Of course they do. We all hide our less attractive habits; do you want them to display it out in public?

They have continuously sought to strip employees of the right to negotiate for better pay and safer working conditions.
A contract invariably requires at least two parties. The military and the courts are the only entities that can demand labor without the consent of the second party. Corporations have no such authority.

They have sold our privacy as a commodity.
This could mean a couple of things but my cursory search revealed no elaboration. Assuming they mean companies that profit from personal information, we must inquire how they obtained that information. Did they break into your house and steal your high school yearbook? Did they hack into your personal computer and download your address book? Or did you give it to them under the terms of use for a service they provided?

They determine economic policy, despite the catastrophic failures their policies have produced and continue to produce.
Solution: Stop creating economic policy. A free market will self regulate. Intelligent design requires an omnipotent, or at least intelligent designer. Government ineptitude requires that we employ economic natural selection else a sustainable financial ecosystem is not even remotely possible.

They have donated large sums of money to politicians, who are responsible for regulating them.
This is called free speech. Individuals do it too.

They continue to block alternate forms of energy to keep us dependent on oil.
Block it? In what way? I see alternative forms of energy all over the place. The fact that they aren't providing it probably has more to do with the viability of those forms. We are dependent on oil because the cost of replacing our infrastructure (to include vehicles, fueling stations, power plants, etc.) greatly outweighs the potential benefits of discontinuing it's use.

They purposefully keep people misinformed and fearful through their control of the media.
Damn that freedom of speech.

They continue to create weapons of mass destruction in order to receive government contracts.
No shit? You mean military weapon systems don't materialize out of thin air?

Protesters, many of your concerns are legitimate, but grossly misdirected. You have the right to assemble and petition for a redress of grievances, but please reconsider who you are petitioning. These corporations have no motivation to hear your pleas, and ultimately are not the problem. Solutions can be found in free market principles; the appropriate course of action is remove the authority of the government to direct market forces.

20110930

Hey, Wall Street Protesters

Since you don't really seem to have any clear idea of what you're doing, perhaps I can make a recommendation.

Follow this map

20110810

Anonymous: you're begining to piss me off

This post will either be ignored, or subject my internetings to severe harassment. Probably the first since nobody reads this blog.

I can certainly sympathize with this group as they bring awareness to problems on the net. Internet censorship, protection of privacy, these are important issues. None of this forgives their methods. Their utter disrespect for private property and free choice is disgusting.

Anonymous, or at least a splinter group, announced last month that it will target Facebook over privacy concerns. Since I can't say for sure who it is, let's just call them the perpetrators.

Let's get something straight, Facebook has access to your private information that you give them. They use that information for profit and potentially to gain favor with other agencies.

Thank the Lord for our great Internet protectors for saving us from the evils of our own free choices. Save us from posting our private information on the Internet after agreeing to EULAs that we don't read. Save us from our own stupidity.

For people who claim to oppose censorship, there seems to be a good number who wish to censor it themselves.

Free speech requires platforms. If you want to broadcast on the radio, you need a radio. If you want to hang a banner, you'll probably want a printing press. If you want to communicate on the Internet, you'll need some kind of service for it. These services do not come without a cost. They require programmers, moderators, graphic designers, servers, data service, power, and real estate.

This stuff costs money. It must be funded in some way. There are several models available.

Model 1: Paid service. Would you pay to use Facebook? I can't go a week without getting spammed with some kind of petition to protest against an imagined plan to do just that.

Model 2: Sell adspace and use personal information to target that marketing. Pretty sure that's what they're doing now.

Model 3: Grants and donations. I'm sure the authoritarian ideal is to have it funded by the government. As a frequent user of government communication systems, I can assure the uninitiated that they suck. Even the government realizes that their systems are not that effective, which is why every federal agency has a Facebook presence.

I am reluctant to use this term, but the plan to "destroy" Facebook is pretty much terrorism. What will the end result be? Do you expect FB to change it's policies? Best case is that you convince all companies to remove their presence altogether. That will leave us with what? What is the alternative service that the activists will allow us to use?

If you don't like the current model, don't use it. Build an alternative (P2P OSS social networking would be awesome). Denying others from making the election is censorship, no matter how noble your intentions. Do not depose the corporate tyrant to replace it with an anonymous one.

20110728

New video and recent happenings

The last couple of weeks has been a bit hectic with the computer crashing, and a major event at work. Part 2 of my multibox video was delayed until I could pull it off of my old hard drive.

I'm up and running now with a more powerful machine, and a redesigned apartment that should not only give me more flexibility to record audio and video, but also maintain a bit of sanity as I will no longer be sharing the computer room with my wife. This of course comes at the expense of our living room, which we never used anyway.

This week's video is a day early because for some reason I thought it was Friday (trying to make the releases consistent). I've done an open mic style cover of Soul to Squeeze by the Red Hot Chili Peppers.


 I'm uploading covers under the hope that Youtube and the appropriate agencies will find it in their hearts to collect royalties from Youtube's ad revenue rather than delete my account.

I am working on recording a song I wrote some 15 or so years ago, but I have no clue when it will be ready; not for a few months I suspect.

In the mean time, I've got a few other ideas. Really just trying to figure out my place on Youtube.

20110719

New Computer

Well, sort of anyway.

About a week ago my main machine (the one with all my videos and capability for editing) died. It was either the MOBO or CPU (doesn't really matter which).

My new machine is assembled, and fortunately the OS booted without too much fuss (try that in Windows) but I'm not 100% just yet.

Problem # 1: I've got 6BG of system memory, but Ubuntu is only showing 2.

Problem #2: I have relevant files stored on two Parallel ATA drives, and no such port on my new motherboard. I do however have a new 2TB disk, and an old USB device that I can connect the old drives to. Just a matter of a simple cp -R and wait for a few hours.


If we're lucky, part 2 of the multibox series will be ready this week.

20110712

I love self righteous idiots

A dumbass decided to use the Army Reserve's Facebook page to spout off his conspiracy theories. Private messages follow:


  • Daddy Warcrimes
    • Highly inappropriate for the Army Reserve page. That, and you're an idiot.

      ------------------------------
      The comment:
      Dean Berry (07/12): Š - AMERICAN TROOPS ARE IN THE MIDDLE EAST BECAUSE THE "JEWS" WHO OWN THE FEDERAL RESERVE WANT A BILLION MORE INTEREST-PAYING CUSTOMERS. They're making up or engineering excuses to invade these countries so they can replace all the NON-INT...EREST-CHARGING Islamic banks with Fed-like Rothschild banking mafias. Also, the "jews" are using their media to train Americans to hate Sharia law, not because it gives secondary status to women ("jews" couldn't care less about anyone's status but their own) but because it prohibits the collecting of interest. STOP BELIEVING THE JUDEO-COMMUNIST PROPAGANDA!!! DEAN BERRY MINISTRIES
  • Dean Berry
    24 minutes ago
    Dean Berry
    • Guilt is why so many of you guys are committing suicide. You know you're murdering people, and you will be spending eternity in hell.
  • Dean Berry
    23 minutes ago
    Dean Berry
    • You look really wise smoking that pipe.
      Too bad wisdom is determined by your actions not your appearance. AMERICAN TROOPS ARE IN THE MIDDLE EAST BECAUSE THE "JEWS" WHO OWN THE FEDERAL RESERVE WANT A BILLION MORE INTEREST-PAYING CUSTOMERS. They're making up or engineering excuses to invade these countries so they can replace all the NON-INTEREST-CHARGING Islamic banks with Fed-like Rothschild banking mafias. Also, the "jews" are using their media to train Americans to hate Sharia law, not because it gives secondary status to women ("jews" couldn't care less about anyone's status but their own) but because it prohibits the collecting of interest. STOP BELIEVING THE JUDEO-COMMUNIST PROPAGANDA!!! DEAN BERRY MINISTRIES
  • Stephen Pate
    19 minutes ago
    Daddy Warcrimes
    • So long as you're not going with me, I can accept going to hell.

      Murder is unjustified homicide. Killing in war is considered justified. Further, I've never killed anyone, but I'm sure that point is completely unimportant to you.

      Since I have see the exact text copied twice now, I'd say that qualifies as spam as well.
  • Dean Berry
    15 minutes ago
    Dean Berry
    • Jesus, please put this junk in hell right away. He knows he deserves it. And come to him in his dreams, please, give him a little taste of what hell will be like. Show him the Holy Bible, nowhere does it say murder is justified. And please aid us in our fight to jettison these communists from your Christ-ordained America. In Jesus' name, Amen. DEAN BERRY MINISTRIES.
  • Stephen Pate
    9 minutes ago
    Daddy Warcrimes
    • Jesus has come to me in my dreams; and we have an understanding.

      Murder is not the same as homicide. Murder is by definition not justified, but killing in many cases is. Take for example Exodus 22:2
  • Dean Berry
    6 minutes ago
    Dean Berry
    • You're murdering muslims to install k_ke banks. Also to steal their oil AND HEROIN. You must not be much of a man if you can't see this. And you're certainly not much of a Christian. All evidence points to the "jews" you worship as the perpetrators of 9/11. Of course, you have to be man enough to peruse something other than their "news" media to ascertain this. HEROIN! America will be made upright soon, and all traitors will be tried for High Treason. To be executed when found guilty. Will you be one of them or will you do the right thing and spill the beans on how many women and kids you've murdered. It's becoming too late.
    • And don't compare yourself to God's armies. You work for the synagogue of satan. This is what Jesus/God called the "jews" you worship. You're the armies of satan.
  • Stephen Pate
    a few seconds ago
    Daddy Warcrimes
    • I'll come clean right now; I've murdered exactly zero. I killed a lizard with a stick when I was a kid, and shot a butterfly a few years back. Does that count as murdering muslims?

      I'm confused here. You claim to be a Christian, I do not. Christ was a Jew. Wouldn't that make you a "Jew worshiper"?

      It's clear that I'm not going to change your views on this, as all you want to do is repeatedly spout the same accusations without citing any evidence. You have caused me great amusement this morning though.

20110710

Caylee's Law

Facebook has brought my attention to "Caylee's Law", which is the result of people pissed off about the recent Anthony trial.

I've got several problems with this plan, and I shall now enumerate:

1. Knee jerk reaction laws are normally the worst kind.

2. The woman was convicted of a crime, and has spent years in jail as a result.

3. She was found not guilty of the serious crimes because there was no proof that she committed any. Beyond they lying to the police, I have not seen any proof that a crime was even committed. This is not a failure of the justice system, but a success.

4. "that a new law be put into effect making it a felony for a parent, legal guardian, or caretaker to not notify law enforcement of the disappearance of a child within 24 hours". Two issues here:
     a. Many jurisdictions will not allow missing persons reports until after 24 hours.
     b. Not every ward is a 3 year old girl.

5. "This way there will be no more cases like Casey Anthony's in the courts", translation: "We don't like this lady and we wish her to be punished even though she was exonerated by the court."

6. "The case of Caylee Anthony was tragic, and there is no reason for another case like this one to hit the courts" Exactly, it was a waste of time and money to prosecute a case with such a poor collection of evidence.

7. I can only see such laws resulting in an overburdened law enforcement community. Police will be so busy with teenagers breaking curfew that actual missing kids will go unnoticed.

8. Why in the hell are these million+ people petitioning the president and congress? Missing persons are not a federal issue.

9. Laws for neglect already exist, and ought to adequately address the situation.

Justice is not derived from popular opinion. Convictions must be made with proof beyond reasonable doubt. Sometimes the person you think did it will not be punished. This is especially true if you can't even prove that a murder took place.

I don't have a solution, but we need to accept that creating additional laws is not going to make our planet into a utopia.